The Soapbox Road Show/ Est. 2005

28th Amendment - Campaign Finance Refrom
Home
Soapbox Blog
War on Women
War on Immigrants
War on Middle Class / Unions
War on Gays/ Lesbians
Global Warming/ Environment
PEAK OIL/ Global Warming
Campaign Finance Refrom
Election 2012 Photo Gallery
Paul Ryan Photo Gallery
Sarah Palin Photo Gallery
You Tube uploads
Economic Recession Crisis
Good Books
You Tube: Soapbox
VIDEOS: Youtube favorites
The Afghanistan Mess
Other Videos; Rachel Maddow, Jon Stewart
Military-Industrial Complex
Losing Our Democracy
Rightwing Hate Photo Gallery
Hate Radio
Right Wingers
Tea Party
Korrupt Korporations $$$
Korrupt Republikans
Occupation: Iraq/ Afghanistan
Global Warming News - UK
Pics: Your Favorite Politicians
DOCUMENTS/ Downing St. Memo
IMPEACHMENT/ Wiretapping/ Scandals

“Money and Democracy Update” is Public Citizen’s weekly e-newsletter about the intersection of money and politics. It is part of our ongoing campaign to track the results of — and ultimately overturn — the U.S. Supreme Court’s reckless decision in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, which allows for-profit corporations to spend unlimited amounts of money to support or attack political candidates. We’ll update you regularly with select news stories and blog posts, legislative developments and ways to get involved.

Stunning Statistics of the Week:

  • $750 million: The amount President Barack Obama raised and spent in the 2008 campaign
  • $1 billion: The estimated amount his campaign will cost in 2012

Big bucks in the race for Oklahoma City Council
Oklahoma City Council members make just $12,000 a year, but apparently they are powerful enough to attract big bucks to their campaigns. Candidates and groups running independent campaigns to support candidates have raised $1.2 million and spent $1 million of that – an unprecedented amount, the Oklahoman reports. Two groups alone account for $545,000 of that. Although they are required to identify their donors, they merely list a nonprofit group as a donor, leaving the public in the dark as to who is really funneling money into the races.

Citizens United affects even local races, like this one in Alaska
An independent group is diving into the race for Anchorage’s Assembly, which is its city council. The new group, which is getting its money from developers and commercial real estate owners, is running ads designed to oust three progressive incumbents. Such independent spending would not have been possible for the U.S. Supreme Court’s January 2010 ruling in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, an Alaska official told the Anchorage Daily News. That ruling gave corporations the green light to spend unlimited amounts of money to sway elections.

Tens of millions being raised for redistricting fights
Top Republicans and Democrats in the U.S. House of Representatives are raising millions of unregulated money from hidden sources for redistricting fights, Politico reports. The lawmakers could raise upwards of $30 million. The Federal Election Commission has given its blessing; it voted last year to allow lawmakers to raise money for an organization called the National Democratic Redistricting Trust. It is anticipated that much of the money will go toward legal costs.

Two former White House aides mull creation of independent political group
Remember how in 2008 candidate Barack Obama decried special interests raising money for independent campaign efforts? How times have changed. It appears as though two former White House aides are going to launch an independent political group to help Obama and combat the flood of independent group spending on the GOP side.

Top 10 things every voter should know about money in politics
Our friends at the Center for Responsive Politics have put together the top 10 things every voter should know about money in politics. Number 8: Enforcement of campaign laws is weak. No. 7: The fundraising never stops. No. 2: Incumbents nearly always win. No. 1? Click here to find out.

U.S. Supreme Court hears challenge to Arizona clean elections law
U.S. Supreme Court justices this week heard arguments in a case challenging part of Arizona’s clean elections law. For proponents of the law, things didn’t go so well.

With higher dues, realtors may get say in political spending
The National Association of Realtors in May will ask its members if they support a dues increase to pay for political efforts to press for things like preserving the mortgage interest deduction. So far, the group has funded its political work by voluntary contributions. But since the Citizens United decision, the goalposts have changed, the groups said. The International Business Times summarized the group’s position: “[I]n the new political financing environment, it is both unrealistic and unnecessary to expect voluntary contributions to increase to the extent needed for realtors to maintain their influence.” If approved, dues would be raised from $80 to $120.

Romney giving lots of money to the Republican Party
Potential presidential contender Mitt Romney is currying favor with the Republican Party by sending money. Romney has sent $25,000 to New Jersey’s Republican Party, $5,000 each to the Wisconsin and Massachusetts state parties and $6,000 to New Hampshire’s state party. Oh, and he also has given more than $300,000 to Republicans in Congress.

Visit DemocracyIsForPeople.org to learn more!

H.J.RES.74 -- Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States permitting Congress and the States to regulate the expenditure of funds by corporations engaging in political speech. (Introduced in House - IH)

HJ 74 IH

111th CONGRESS 2d Session

H. J. RES. 74

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States permitting Congress and the States to regulate the expenditure of funds by corporations engaging in political speech.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

February 2, 2010

Ms. EDWARDS of Maryland (for herself and Mr. CONYERS) introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

JOINT RESOLUTION

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States permitting Congress and the States to regulate the expenditure of funds by corporations engaging in political speech.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States within seven years after the date of its submission for ratification:

`Article--

    `Section 1. The sovereign right of the people to govern being essential to a free democracy, Congress and the States may regulate the expenditure of funds for political speech by any corporation, limited liability company, or other corporate entity.
    `Section 2. Nothing contained in this Article shall be construed to abridge the freedom of the press.'.

 

It's Time for a Constitutional Amendment

Record spending in the 2010 election -- including hundreds of millions of corporate dollars --  has shown us clearly what’s wrong with the idea that corporations have a right to spend limitless money on elections, as if they were people.  When corporations take over our democracy, people lose.

In January 2010, a closely divided Supreme Court opened the floodgates, ruling that corporations have a Constitutional “free speech” right to spend money on elections.  The court trampled on decades of settled law, including the new McCain-Feingold law enacted just a few years ago by members of Congress from both parties. 
 
Corporations (and the Supreme Court) are out of control.  It’s time to take back our democracy.  Sign on now:

It’s time for a Constitutional amendment to make it clear that Free Speech and other Constitutional rights are for people, not corporations.
 
A Constitutional amendment is the right answer when the court over-reaches and tries to keep democracy out of the hands of the people.  We’ve amended the Constitution 27 times, securing voting rights for women, African-Americans, and people as young as 18, and making it clear that Senators must be elected by popular vote.  

A Constitutional amendment is the right answer now, to take America back from the corporations.  Polling shows that the public disagrees strongly with the Court’s decision favoring corporate “speech”.[1]

Fortunately, corporations and the Supreme Court do not have the last word.  We, the people, do.

-----
[1]: Washington Post: “Poll: Large majority opposes Supreme Court's decision on campaign financing,” 2/17/10.

To correct the damage the Supreme Court has done to the First Amendment, we need to pass a constitutional amendment of our own that puts people ahead of corporations.

Below is our resolution in support of the Free Speech for People Amendment.  

ADD YOUR NAME IN SUPPORT OF THIS RESOLUTION»

WHEREAS the First Amendment to the United States Constitution was designed to protect the free speech rights of people, not corporations;

WHEREAS, for the past three decades, a divided United States Supreme Court has transformed the First Amendment into a powerful tool for corporations seeking to evade and invalidate democratically-enacted reforms;

WHEREAS, this corporate takeover of the First Amendment has reached its extreme conclusion in the United States Supreme Court’s recent ruling in Citizens United v. FEC;

WHEREAS, the United States Supreme Court’s ruling in Citizens United v. FEC overturned longstanding precedent prohibiting corporations from spending their general treasury funds in our elections;

WHEREAS, the United States Supreme Court’s ruling in Citizens United v. FEC will now unleash a torrent of corporate money in our political process unmatched by any campaign expenditure totals in United States history;

WHEREAS, the United States Supreme Court’s ruling in Citizens United v. FEC presents a serious and direct threat to our democracy;

WHEREAS, the people of the United States have previously used the constitutional amendment process to correct those egregiously wrong decisions of the United States Supreme Court that go to the heart of our democracy and self-government;

NOW HEREBY BE IT RESOLVED THAT WE THE UNDERSIGNED VOTERS OF THE UNITED STATES CALL UPON THE UNITED STATES CONGRESS TO PASS AND SEND TO THE STATES FOR RATIFICATION A CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT TO RESTORE THE FIRST AMENDMENT AND FAIR ELECTIONS TO THE PEOPLE.

Learn more about the "Free Speech for People Amendment"

ADD YOUR NAME IN SUPPORT OF THIS RESOLUTION»

Enter content here

Enter supporting content here